|
is compatible in the ISM wireless bands and channel schemes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
usage is free of licensing in the European Union.
|
|
|
|
|
|
utilises BlueTooth® 2.45 GHz wireless systems for small and simple tokens.
|
|
|
|
|
|
requires no exclusive usage of frequencies or channels.
|
|
|
|
|
|
complies with standardisation of IEEE and ISO.
|
|
|
|
|
|
prefers standardised components and is compatible with usual BlueTooth® units.
|
|
|
|
|
|
uses instead of simple dongles the TokLoc® BlueTooth® Screentenna.
|
|
|
|
|
|
requires for distinction of instances just one BlueTooth® unit per object.
|
|
|
|
|
|
needs a minimal operational setup of infrastructure on the basis of existing standards.
|
|
|
|
|
|
starts on the basis of simple common and mandatory prerequisites: All subscribed shall wear a TokLoc® token. Objects of interest shall be labelled or tagged with Tags working as TokLoc® tokens. Then TokLoc® functions operate autonomously and dependent to the actual contiguity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
works on the basis that BlueTooth® identity gets read on approach to an equipped work position.
|
|
|
|
|
|
primarily serves for access control on approach and at access.
|
|
|
|
|
|
defines the work position as the operational theatre and ignores remote objects and persons.
|
|
|
|
|
|
recognises the presence of a token in contiguity through common inquiry or directed paging.
|
|
|
|
|
|
concept goes far beyond index locating as with fixed RFID reader positions. Contiguity information is obtained from repetitive enquiry or paging.
|
|
|
|
|
|
implementation may be matched with directly related sequences of video records at choke points. Video recording at work positions with individuals is generally not supported.
|
|
|
|
|
|
stipulates neither real time tracking nor any retrospective tracing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
performs much better than with choke point or handheld reading of passive RFID tags.
|
|
|
|
|
|
makes the most of physics and logics with wireless locating.
|
|
|
|
|
|
works on the basis that BlueTooth® token get recognised in the contiguity or on approach to equipped work positions and with reading the identities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
recognises well the limitations of physics and the limitations of components.
|
|
|
|
|
|
makes no assumptions on operational conditions but just takes the physical restrictions and the technology limits into account.
|
|
|
|
|
|
in addition to scanning and detecting infers the results of the applied technologies to one comprehensive access control regime.
|
|
|
|
